Re: Parallel vacuum: workers together with leader could overrun cost budget

From: surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel vacuum: workers together with leader could overrun cost budget
Date: 2026-10-29 20:55:45
Message-ID: CAOVWO5rK3qA7SY+2+K0HqSmmq-NskqtX=dTdMCn8t+4kETrWbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Bharath,

Thanks for v3. The doc changes read well, and the maintenance.sgml wording
makes the shared limit clear.

v3 looks good to me.

Thanks,
Surya Poondla

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Greg Burd 2026-10-29 20:53:33 Re: Tepid: selective index updates for heap relations