Re: PostgreSQL training recommendations?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL training recommendations?
Date: 2012-10-17 15:05:56
Message-ID: CAOR=d=2+3yyzgUSig8ZgXC3fHsGEPaV7tHFdqMprT3Rhj7RdoA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr> wrote:
>>
>> I am surprised none of the fine contributors to this thread mentionned
>> an activity they practice extensively, which is reading this list's
>> content every day.
>>
>> Best training material ever in my opinion.
>
> A pay-for magazine you can probably claim on your taxes as a necessary
> expense. Is it possible somehow to claim that reading this list is
> vital to your work, and therefore the 5 hours a week you spend
> answering other threads (in order to repay the community) is a
> legitimate work expense? :)

I've been on more than one job interview where the guy interviewing me
is someone who's question I've answered in the past here.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Will Rutherdale (rutherw) 2012-10-17 15:22:03 Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard?
Previous Message David Johnston 2012-10-17 15:01:55 Re: problem with distinct not distincting...