Re: Default Partition for Range

From: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default Partition for Range
Date: 2017-06-04 03:56:11
Message-ID: CAOGQiiPgH99Ka4vbSV9EDxMuuy5gHcibv8wrb6RGri5GVDFbTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think if you have found spelling mistakes unrelated to this patch,
>> then it is better to submit those as a separate patch in a new thread.
>
> +1.

Sure, attached is the version without those changes.

--
Regards,
Rafia Sabih
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
cosmetic_range_default_partition_v2.patch application/octet-stream 10.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-06-04 04:34:58 Re: ALTER INDEX .. SET STATISTICS ... behaviour
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-06-04 02:39:31 Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table