Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2017-01-17 07:20:37
Message-ID: CAOG9ApHqKMFPbVvtbjZoBrHJkvnSueePgMU1TJP1c=pXWDm1RA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I have already made patch for the generic SHOW replication command
> > (attached) and am working on the new initdb patch based on that.
> > I have not yet fixed the pg_standby issue. I am trying to address all the
> > comments and bugs still.
>
> Having documentation for this patch in protocol.sgml would be nice.
>

Yes. I will add that.

--
Thank you,

Beena Emerson

Have a Great Day!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-17 07:25:41 Re: jsonb_delete with arrays
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-17 07:08:22 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size