Re: Default Partition for Range

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default Partition for Range
Date: 2017-08-17 08:34:25
Message-ID: CAOG9ApGe3LX4+9s4qrwOSmhs5+OBE2tcQFT2ntSL5eZq9Mp+Og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

PFA the updated patch which returns NULL instead of true when the
default partition has no constraints and also have modified the output
as discussed above.

This applies over v24 patch [1] of default list partition. I will
rebase over the next version when it is updated.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOgcT0OVwDu%2BbeChWb5R5s6rfKLCiWcZT5617hqu7T3GdA1hAw%40mail.gmail.com
--

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
default_range_partition_v11.patch application/octet-stream 28.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2017-08-17 08:39:23 Re: why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-08-17 08:27:05 Re: Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions