From: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Date: | 2015-10-20 11:10:08 |
Message-ID: | CAOG9ApEawDVGrEn1Qi5hWqP1=qqyTkfH7osRA4wzj6RWCFi_GA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Attached patch is a rough patch which supports multi sync replication
> by another approach I sent before.
>
> The new GUC parameters are:
> * synchronous_standby_num, which specifies the number of standby
> servers using sync rep. (default is 0)
> * synchronous_replication_method, which specifies replication method;
> priority or quorum. (default is priority)
>
> The behaviour of 'priority' and 'quorum' are same as what we've been
> discussing.
> But I write overview of these here again here.
>
> [Priority Method]
> The standby server has each different priority, and the active standby
> servers having the top N priroity are become sync standby server.
> If synchronous_standby_names = '*', the all active standby server
> would be sync standby server.
> If you want to set up standby like 9.5 or before, you can set
> synchronous_standby_num = 1.
>
>
I used the following setting with 2 servers A and D connected:
synchronous_standby_names = 'A,B,C,D'
synchronous_standby_num = 2
synchronous_replication_method = 'priority'
Though s_r_m = 'quorum' worked fine, changing it to 'priority' caused
segmentation fault.
Regards,
Beena Emerson
Have a Great Day!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-10-20 11:14:54 | Re: Multi-column distinctness. |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-10-20 10:39:15 | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |