Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans
Date: 2019-12-27 06:29:48
Message-ID: CAOBaU_byFzvj0BeNEBxwAL6yonO5SOqRsXJuoqM-izBh7+i-Ww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:31 AM Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I wanted to follow up on this patch since I received no feedback. What should my next steps be (besides rebasing, though I want to confirm there's interest before I do that)?

Given Andres' answer I'd say that there's interest in this patch. You
should register this patch in the next commitfest
(https://commitfest.postgresql.org/26/) to make sure that it's not
forgotten, which unfortunately is probably what happened here .

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2019-12-27 07:34:30 Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-12-27 05:01:14 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table