From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Arthur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add pg_file_sync() to adminpack |
Date: | 2020-01-14 22:12:18 |
Message-ID: | CAOBaU_bscJbeHMuMgu3z2HdT1f49z6cmXtbaBiLH+QyEwi-i+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le mar. 14 janv. 2020 à 22:57, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> a écrit :
> Greetings,
>
> * Julien Rouhaud (rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:50 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:39 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > > I think that pg_write_server_files should be allowed to call that
> > > > function by default.
> > >
> > > But pg_write_server_files users are not allowed to execute
> > > other functions like pg_file_write() by default. So doing that
> > > change only for pg_file_sync() looks strange to me.
> >
> > Ah indeed. I'm wondering if that's an oversight of the original
> > default role patch or voluntary.
>
> It was intentional.
>
ok, thanks for the clarification.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-01-14 22:12:47 | Re: planner support functions: handle GROUP BY estimates ? |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2020-01-14 22:09:18 | Re: Use compiler intrinsics for bit ops in hash |