Re: Collation versioning

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Collation versioning
Date: 2020-11-04 08:21:47
Message-ID: CAOBaU_bP=BGMU9hw7QFhbirCQASuouvfmfSNiqpbHkKp5V-Seg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 4:11 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 08:44:15AM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> > We could create a static table with the conversion based on what was
> > discussed for commit a169155, please find attached a spreadsheet with the
> > comparison. This would require maintenance as new LCIDs are released [1].
> >
> > [1]
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-lcid/70feba9f-294e-491e-b6eb-56532684c37f
>
> I am honestly not a fan of something like that as it has good chances
> to rot.

Same here.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-11-04 08:39:10 Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-11-04 08:10:54 Re: Collation versioning