| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Collation versioning |
| Date: | 2019-11-04 15:18:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAOBaU_bJEJmi46qhdgmwf6NfG5u_=1j=u+gPm=OoH-d+q=pAeA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:13 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:58 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Here are some problems to think about:
> >
> > * We'd need to track dependencies on the default collation once we
> > have versioning for that [...]
Another problem I just thought about is how to avoid discrepancy of
collation version for indexes on shared objects, such as
pg_database_datname_index.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2019-11-04 15:39:49 | Re: auxiliary processes in pg_stat_ssl |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2019-11-04 15:14:09 | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |