Re: [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering
Date: 2017-09-26 17:59:25
Message-ID: CAOBaU_atLPyCqgiNNxczAvGffWP8f7E-2piWFZriRwJPt-nwgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> That's true, but numCols, sortColdIdx etc are also used to display the
>> sort key in an explain. If an append can return sorted data, it
>> should also display the sort information, so I think these fields are
>> still required in an Append node.
>
> I don't think so. An index scan doesn't output that information, nor
> does a nested loop which inherits a sort order from its outer path. I
> think the rule is that a plan node which takes steps to get the data
> into a certain order might want to output something about that, but a
> plan node which somehow gets that ordering without taking any explicit
> action doesn't print anything.

Oh, ok that indeed makes sense. As I said I'll remove all the useless
noise and send an updated patch. Thanks again.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Schneider 2017-09-26 18:26:39 User-perspective knowledge about wait events
Previous Message Henry 2017-09-26 17:55:01 Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output