Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?

From: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)free(dot)fr>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Date: 2019-08-02 08:54:35
Message-ID: CAOBaU_aPixr3sj8Ov7o4eToOdA0f68ZV+Z4drn2LHn4QJTj8Tg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:05 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> I'm actually quite unconvinced that it's sensible to update the global
> value for nested queries. That'll mean e.g. the log_line_prefix and
> pg_stat_activity values are most of the time going to be bogus while
> nested, because the querystring that's associated with those will *not*
> be the value that the queryid corresponds to. elog.c uses
> debug_query_string to log the statement, which is only updated for
> top-level queries (outside of some exceptions like parallel workers for
> parallel queries in a function or stuff like that). And pg_stat_activity
> is also only updated for top level queries.

Having the nested queryid seems indeed quite broken for
log_line_prefix. However having the nested queryid in
pg_stat_activity would be convenient to track what is a long stored
functions currently doing. Maybe we could expose something like
top_level_queryid and current_queryid instead?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-08-02 08:57:31 Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-08-02 08:42:42 Re: The unused_oids script should have a reminder to use the 8000-8999 OID range