Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Date: 2021-07-29 18:04:16
Message-ID: CAOBaU_ZRhXZN9qfWfyO+8pSLX6McFVwLYoDcsMtpvhd0pdiz3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:14 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:46:12AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> > This assumes that the scripts executed during CREATE EXTENSION have no
> > conditional code in them that depends on the server version. Running the
> > same SQL script on different server versions can have different effects.
> >
> > I don't have a ready example of such an extension, but if we ever would
> > convert the backend parts of Slony into an extension, it would be one.
>
> The bottom line is that we have _no_ mechanism to handle this except
> uninstalling the extension before the upgrade and re-installing it
> afterward, which isn't clearly spelled out for each extension, as far as
> I know, and would not work for extensions that create data types.
>
> Yes, I do feel this is a big hold in our upgrade instructions.

FWIW I have an example of such an extension: powa-archivist extension
script runs an anonymous block code and creates if needed a custom
wrapper to emulate the current_setting(text, boolean) variant that
doesn't exist on pre-pg96 servers.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2021-07-29 18:06:10 Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-07-29 17:43:09 Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly