| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
| Date: | 2022-01-12 08:27:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAOBaU_ZMKVs_1jadL-JKbtafiC89yc0x+3ToDyQavHvLqrucjg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:00 PM Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> So it should be ok if the temporary undo is managed and discarded by
> individual backends. Patch 0005 of the new series tries to do that.
The cfbot reports that at least the 001 patch doesn't apply anymore:
http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_36_3228.log
> === applying patch ./undo-20211125/0001-Add-SmgrId-to-smgropen-and-BufferTag.patch
> [...]
> patching file src/bin/pg_waldump/pg_waldump.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 480 (offset 17 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 500.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 531.
> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/bin/pg_waldump/pg_waldump.c.rej
Could you send a rebased version? In the meantime I'll switch the cf
entry to Waiting on Author.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-01-12 08:57:27 | Re: DELETE CASCADE |
| Previous Message | Pavel Borisov | 2022-01-12 07:58:24 | Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index. |