From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans |
Date: | 2019-03-08 21:20:39 |
Message-ID: | CAOBaU_Z4MU3xNH57_U_EW3cdR09d7bTnJuSM2DX3ks+Nv0m=6Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > [ v9-0001-Allow-Append-to-be-used-in-place-of-MergeAppend-f.patch ]
>
> I think you should remove all that
> and restrict this optimization to the case where all the subpaths are
> natively ordered --- if we have to insert Sorts, it's hardly going to move
> the needle to worry about simplifying the parent MergeAppend to Append.
This can be a huge win for queries of the form "ORDER BY partkey LIMIT
x". Even if the first subpath(s) aren't natively ordered, not all of
the sorts should actually be performed.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-03-08 21:21:50 | Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2019-03-08 20:54:54 | Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database |