Re: Wrong return code in vacuumdb when multiple jobs are used

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong return code in vacuumdb when multiple jobs are used
Date: 2019-05-09 06:19:44
Message-ID: CAOBaU_Z-05xcJEmRDFE6igh8AhcvVTV_iveAgFHKgsOK27HV0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:32 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 11:48:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > +1, waiting till after the minor releases are tagged seems wisest.
> > We can still push it before 12beta1, so it will get tested in the beta
> > period.
>
> The new minor releases have been tagged, so committed.

Thanks a lot!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-05-09 06:28:36 Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use"
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios 2019-05-09 06:17:37 Re: integrate Postgres Users Authentication with our own LDAP Server