Re: Propagate XLogFindNextRecord error to callers

From: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mircea Cadariu <cadariu(dot)mircea(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Propagate XLogFindNextRecord error to callers
Date: 2026-02-09 10:06:30
Message-ID: CAO6_Xqqv5F2cdgs5zCVzLJMOuO6zStsC97gcm41dFNSWOh6B8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 10:36 AM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> For consistency, this should use the %X/%08X format as elsewhere.

Good catch, I've updated the patch.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Propage-errormsg-to-XLogFindNextRecord-caller.patch application/octet-stream 8.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2026-02-09 10:14:47 Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2026-02-09 10:02:10 Re: Fix a bug in extension_file_exists()