Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting

From: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting
Date: 2024-03-28 10:12:40
Message-ID: CAO6_Xqpt9t4Oyn9TBS9HeOupfuaH1B4xU9SYbs7k86cVK6m92w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thanks for the review.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> As for the proposed patch, the following part should handle the temp
> tables too:
>

True, I've missed the local blocks. I've updated the patch:
- read_rate and write_rate now include local block usage
- I've added a specific output for reporting local blocks instead of
combining them in the same output.

Regards,
Anthonin

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Fix-parallel-vacuum-buffer-usage-reporting.patch application/octet-stream 10.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-03-28 10:33:00 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-03-28 10:04:21 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby