| From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump verbose start and stop times? |
| Date: | 2025-05-30 12:39:43 |
| Message-ID: | CANzqJaCqvh4TMxMzkbP-pFSOpCMqjJsyfSkOziPmOwrKcbVWvg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 1:45 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 20:51 -0400, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Honestly, who cares if start and stop times are in the dump file?
> stderr is where a DBA wants to see timings.
>
> I guess everybody has different preferences.
> These days, few DBAs stare at the screen, waiting for a report on the
> console
> when the job is done.
>
Unix has had stderr redirection for 35(?) years. Mailing lists are for
small reproducers, not for 2MB of output from "real" backups.
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2025-05-30 12:54:24 | Re: pg_dump verbose start and stop times? |
| Previous Message | Ilya Kosmodemiansky | 2025-05-30 10:56:36 | Re: Seeking Suggestions for Best Practices: Archiving and Migrating Historical Data in PostgreSQL |