From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new? |
Date: | 2025-07-05 18:19:45 |
Message-ID: | CANzqJaCA_FA+e4kn5yqgSm=fc-cPrgFQocL12-45R-UUeEmwyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 2:11 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 7/5/25 09:52, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [Hope this gets through after dumping DKIM-ignorant mail provider.]
> >
> > Wanting to upgrade from:
> > PostgreSQL 15.13 on x86_64-mageia-linux-gnu,
> > compiled by gcc (Mageia 15.1.0-1.mga10) 15.1.0, 64-bit
> > to:
> > PG 17.5
> >
> > Way back, I was able to use -k|--link option on pg_upgrade (PG13 to
> PG15);
> > but since then:
> >
> > - my DB has grown to over 8TB
>
> How did you measure above?
>
> > - even with ~70TB, I don't have enough contiguous disk space to
> > dump/restore
>
> What was the pg_dump command?
For something that big, he must have been doing an uncompressed plain
format dump instead of a directory/custom format dump. Maybe even added
--attribute-inserts too.
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pf | 2025-07-05 18:24:16 | Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-07-05 18:11:32 | Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new? |