Re: Postgres memoizing inner loop of join when outer loop join key is guaranteed unique?

What's the actual problem? Does enable_memoize=on return incorrect results?

Because a 45 microsecond (yes, 45 microseconds: 0.138 milliseconds = 138
microseconds; same for the others) slowdown isn't something I'd get too
worked up about.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 2:29 PM Jacob Jackson <jej(dot)jackson(dot)08(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hello. I was looking at some query plans recently and noticed something
> that didn't make sense. I have a query that joins a table of questions with
> results for each question (using a table with a composite primary key of
> question id and a user id), filtered by user id. The question IDs and the
> combined question-userIds are guaranteed unique due to being primary keys,
> and yet Postgres still memoizes the inner loop results. Any ideas why? Is
> this just a failure of the query planner (I would be happy to explore
> creating a PR), did I not properly guarantee uniqueness, or is there
> another reason for memoization? The memoized version is consistently
> slightly slower in my testing, despite the calculated cost being lower.
> Here are the query plans:
>
> enable_memoize=on:
>
> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) SELECT * FROM questions LEFT JOIN
> "QuestionUserStatus" ON questions.id = "QuestionUserStatus".question
> WHERE "QuestionUserStatus".user = 0;
>
> Nested Loop (cost=0.71..514.09 rows=277 width=1381) (actual
> time=0.021..0.520 rows=231 loops=1)
> ├ Buffers: shared hit=859
> ├ Index Scan using "QuestionUserStatus_user_question_pk" on
> "QuestionUserStatus" (cost=0.42..178.88 rows=277 width=18) (actual
> time=0.014..0.114 rows=231 loops=1)
> │ ├ Index Cond: ("user" = '0'::bigint)
> │ └ Buffers: shared hit=166
> └ Memoize (cost=0.29..1.25 rows=1 width=1363) (actual time=0.001..0.001
> rows=1 loops=231)
> ├ Cache Key: "QuestionUserStatus".question
> ├ Cache Mode: logical
> ├ Hits: 0 Misses: 231 Evictions: 0 Overflows: 0 Memory Usage: 320kB
> ├ Buffers: shared hit=693
> └ Index Scan using questions_pkey on questions (cost=0.28..1.24 rows=1
> width=1363) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=231)
> ├ Index Cond: (id = "QuestionUserStatus".question)
> └ Buffers: shared hit=693
> Planning:
> └ Buffers: shared hit=6
> Planning Time: 0.183 ms
> Execution Time: 0.548 ms
>
> enable_memoize=off:
>
> Nested Loop (cost=0.70..521.98 rows=277 width=1381) (actual
> time=0.018..0.421 rows=231 loops=1)
> ├ Buffers: shared hit=859
> ├ Index Scan using "QuestionUserStatus_user_question_pk" on
> "QuestionUserStatus" (cost=0.42..178.88 rows=277 width=18) (actual
> time=0.014..0.099 rows=231 loops=1)
> │ ├ Index Cond: ("user" = '3477145805513'::bigint)
> │ └ Buffers: shared hit=166
> └ Index Scan using questions_pkey on questions (cost=0.28..1.24 rows=1
> width=1363) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=231)
> ├ Index Cond: (id = "QuestionUserStatus".question)
> └ Buffers: shared hit=693
> Planning:
> └ Buffers: shared hit=6
> Planning Time: 0.197 ms
> Execution Time: 0.444 ms
>
> Thanks for the help,
> Jacob
>

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!