Re: pgping?

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgping?
Date: 2025-12-13 22:27:00
Message-ID: CANzqJaC=qfACMk4Us4CcP1ryjLWk2YQzLcRrRh34FRG6OVUWpA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 1:19 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Saturday, December 13, 2025, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> pg_isready is "ncat -zv $host 5432" for systems which don't have ncat
>> installed.
>>
>
> Pretty sure this is also an incorrect, or at least incomplete statement.
> pg_isready uses the PostgreSQL wire protocol to make a better
> determination as to readiness than ncat does. People are just complaining
> that it doesn’t go further than it does. They see “user” and “database”
> and misinterpret why those options exist.
>

We've had this discussion before: people see the --dbname and --username
options, then quite reasonably think "ah, those options must mean you can
test whether a specific database and/or role can connect; otherwise, why
the heck would you put them in the --help output?"

Bottom line: the purpose of --dbname is to specify a database name; the
purpose of --username is to specify a username. Having them in the --help
output *misleads the user*.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

  • Re: pgping? at 2025-12-13 18:19:47 from David G. Johnston

Responses

  • Re: pgping? at 2025-12-14 05:59:44 from David G. Johnston

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-12-14 05:59:44 Re: pgping?
Previous Message Gunnar 2025-12-13 18:22:08 Re: pgping?