| From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Download statistics |
| Date: | 2025-10-25 14:43:41 |
| Message-ID: | CANzqJaBfJWDfaUZqa9iU-hk5xFiob+tjFZH-QdoF+xGd3B5kOA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 10:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> writes:
> > The discussion about people avoiding .0 releases over in the "Index
> > corruption ..." thread made me wonder how the distribution really looks
> > like. How many people do install X.0, X.1, etc. for each major version
> > X?
>
> > Download statistics are of course quite noisy but I think they should at
> > least show the trends. Do you have any and would you mind publishing
> > them?
>
> I imagine we have stats for downloads from www.postgresql.org,
> but it's been many years since we thought those were complete
> or even representative.
>
I download one set of RPMs (PG 14.19, for example) and then scp them to 15
different servers. One set of PG 17.6 binaries gets copied to 30 different
servers.
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2025-10-25 15:14:42 | Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication) |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2025-10-25 14:39:35 | Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication) |