Re: CREATE TABLE fails

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE fails
Date: 2026-03-08 23:48:29
Message-ID: CANzqJaB_W5nwDCQ3bdU2017sTLG=Ayhnx5QgksnMFqXM5=f5hQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 7:41 PM Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> David,
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 6:37 PM David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, March 8, 2026, Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> But the page at
> >> >>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-createtable.html#SQL-CREATETABLE-STORAGE-PARAMETERS
> >> >> says it's available.
> >> >>
> >> >> What am I missing?
> >
> >
> > Those are table storage parameters.
> >
> >>
> >> primary
> >> key(id) INCLUDE (drafttype, scoringtype) WITH( fillfactor = 50,
> >> autovacuum_enabled = on ));
> >> ERROR: unrecognized parameter "autovacuum_enabled"
> >> draft=#
> >
> >
> > You are specifying index storage parameters here.
> >
> > The first paragraph of your linked section says:
> >
> > “Storage parameters for indexes are documented in CREATE INDEX.”
> >
> > You will find autovacuum_enabled is not listed there. Because you can’t
> vacuum an index separately from its table.
>
> So I will have to compare the CREATE INDEX page with this one and
> figure out which one is supported where?
>

Well, *yes*. Why should you be shocked that some storage parameters just
aren't relevant to indices.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2026-03-08 23:49:14 CREATE TABLE fails
Previous Message Igor Korot 2026-03-08 23:41:39 Re: CREATE TABLE fails