Re: Backups with filesystem snapshots

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backups with filesystem snapshots
Date: 2025-08-11 13:13:38
Message-ID: CANzqJaBG3yn7-BCgjDuUWqusKSBSsCwk1Lw+vSe26EZQRfMtXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 9:01 AM Nick Cleaton <nick(at)cleaton(dot)net> wrote:

> If I take an instantaneous filesystem-level snapshot of the postgres
> data directory underneath a running postgres server, is that a safe
> backup without doing any pg_start_backup/pg_stop_backup ?
>
> It seems like it should be, so long as I get an atomic snapshot that
> includes both data and wal, because starting up from that snapshot
> should look the same as recovering from an unclean postgres shutdown
> due to a kernel panic.
>

We once restored a whole-system VMware snapshot to a new VM (new IP address
and everything). When I logged in, PG started up without a hiccup; it
took a couple of minutes while WALs rolled forward, but that's to be
expected.

Postgresql didn't (and doesn't) know anything about when snapshots are
taken.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Smith 2025-08-11 15:33:06 Bitnami deprecation
Previous Message Nick Cleaton 2025-08-11 13:01:15 Backups with filesystem snapshots