Re: Are these metadata ALTER TABLE commands transactionally safe?

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Are these metadata ALTER TABLE commands transactionally safe?
Date: 2026-05-15 01:03:47
Message-ID: CANzqJaAqg37Q7HM6uo=BRE2c6_==kawD8EBO6og_MbTp-ayo4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 5:26 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thursday, May 14, 2026, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> PG 17.9
>>
>> BEGIN;
>> ALTER TABLE x RENAME TO x_hold;
>> ALTER TABLE y.x SET SCHEMA a;
>> ALTER TABLE x OWNER TO foo;
>> COMMIT;
>>
>>
> Define “transactionally safe”.
>

Any open transactions will still see the original tables.

>
>
>> I don't trust the validity of synthetic tests when Prod is ill-behaved
>> JDBC connections.
>>
>>
> Then do them over a local connection using psql?
>

The applications which I don't want to throw errors are ill-behaved JDBC
connections. Sorry for the ambiguity.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2026-05-15 01:13:03 Re: Are these metadata ALTER TABLE commands transactionally safe?
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2026-05-14 21:35:46 Re: Pgbouncer