From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: get speed help |
Date: | 2025-05-19 16:43:42 |
Message-ID: | CANzqJaAP3aVYvWqtvL6GBw3Bj=x17cCTODwHECVjG2Qjru59Qg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Spinning rust? SSD? NVMe? SATA? SCSI? Fiber?
Anyway... off the cuff, for 1 giga-rows, that's about a 50GB table. Small
enough that you can easily test that yourself.
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:38 PM Dias Thomas <dsthomas500(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 1 field 20 chars plus primary key id field - small table
> indexed on that char - 20 field , say 16 gb ram, amd normal power processor
> no parallel processing, to know it, the speed in single processor
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:55 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM Dias Thomas <dsthomas500(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>> Could i get a help, postgres 1 billion records indexed table, search
>>> speed in a normal machine, no parallel processing ... for a knowledge ??
>>>
>>
>> 1. How big are the records?
>> 2. How big are the keys?
>> 3. What is a normal machine?
>> 4. Why no parallel processing?
>>
>> --
>> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
>> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
>> <Redacted> lobster!
>>
>
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2025-05-19 18:49:53 | Re: Logical replication, need to reclaim big disk space |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2025-05-19 16:24:57 | Re: get speed help |