| From: | Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement | 
| Date: | 2025-11-03 11:47:40 | 
| Message-ID: | CANxoLDfyk_+h91FNq5VNemXTBpES0aLPtLp2myTyWgquUHSQ3A@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Hi Hackers,
Added a new #define GET_DDL_PRETTY_FLAGS because the existing #define
GET_PRETTY_FLAGS is not suitable for formatting reconstructed DDLs. The
existing #define GET_PRETTY_FLAGS always indents the code, regardless of
whether the flag is set to true or false, which is not the desired behavior
for pg_get_<object>_ddl functions.
Updated the logic of the get_formatted_string function based on Tim
Waizenegger’s suggestion.
I am attaching the new v6 patch, which is ready for review.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 3:08 PM Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
> Thanks, Mark, for your review comments and the updated patch.
>
> I’ve incorporated your changes and prepared a combined v5 patch. The v5
> patch is attached for further review.
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:15 PM Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:47:53PM +0530, Akshay Joshi wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:55 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hello,
>> >
>> >     I have reviewed this patch before and provided a number of comments
>> that
>> >     have been addressed by Akshay (so I encourage you to list my name
>> and
>> >     this address in a Reviewed-by trailer line in the commit message).
>> One
>> >     thing I had not noticed is that while this function has a "pretty"
>> flag,
>> >     it doesn't use it to pass anything to pg_get_expr_worker()'s
>> prettyFlags
>> >     argument, and I think it should -- probably just
>> >
>> >       prettyFlags = GET_PRETTY_FLAGS(pretty);
>> >
>> >     same as pg_get_querydef() does.
>>
>> Kinda sorta similar thought, I've noticed some existing functions like
>> pg_get_constraintdef make the "pretty" flag optional, so I'm wondering
>> if that scheme is also preferred here.
>>
>> I've attached a small diff to the original
>> 0001-Add-pg_get_policy_ddl-function-to-reconstruct-CREATE.patch to
>> illustrate the additional work to follow suit, if so desired.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark
>> --
>> Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> EDB https://enterprisedb.com
>>
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size | 
|---|---|---|
| v6-0001-Add-pg_get_policy_ddl-function-to-reconstruct-CREATE.patch | application/octet-stream | 25.7 KB | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2025-11-03 11:54:35 | Re: 64 bit numbers vs format strings | 
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-11-03 11:46:40 | Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded |