From: | Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Philip Alger <paalger0(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement |
Date: | 2025-10-22 13:19:10 |
Message-ID: | CANxoLDeaQN5=LLnUFk8RF-fGY2EjO81oWaEdAsjCfzz4--re8w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:39 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 16, 2025, at 20:50, Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Please find attached the v3 patch, which resolves all compilation errors
> and warnings.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 6:06 PM Philip Alger <paalger0(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi Akshay,
> >
> >
> > As for the statement terminator, it’s useful to include it, while
> running multiple queries together could result in a syntax error. In my
> opinion, there’s no harm in providing the statement terminator.
> > However, I’ve modified the logic to add the statement terminator at the
> end instead of appending to a new line.
> >
> >
> > Regarding putting the terminator at the end, I think my original comment
> got cut off by my poor editing. Yes, that's what I was referring to; no
> need to append it to a new line.
> >
> > --
> > Best, Phil Alger
> > <v3-0001-Add-pg_get_policy_ddl-function-to-reconstruct-CREATE.patch>
>
> 1 - ruleutils.c
> ```
> + if (pretty)
> + {
> + /* Indent with tabs */
> + for (int i = 0; i < noOfTabChars; i++)
> + {
> + appendStringInfoString(buf, "\t");
> + }
> ```
>
> As you are adding a single char of ‘\t’, better to use
> appendStringInfoChar() that is cheaper.
>
> 2 - ruleutils.c
> ```
> + initStringInfo(&buf);
> +
> + targetTable = relation_open(tableID, AccessShareLock);
> ```
>
> Looks like only usage of opening the table is to get the table name. In
> that case, why don’t just call get_rel_name(tableID) and store the table
> name in a local variable?
>
Fixed the above review comments in the v4 patch. I have used
generate_qualified_relation_name(tableID) instead of get_rel_name(tableID).
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Chao Li (Evan)
> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
> https://www.highgo.com/
>
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2025-10-22 13:20:01 | Re: [PATCH] Remove make_temptable_name_n() |
Previous Message | BharatDB | 2025-10-22 12:59:25 | Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_rewind false positives caused by shutdown-only WAL |