Re: Allow pageinspect's bt_page_stats function to return a set of rows instead of a single row

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 00:36, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > That attached patch is based on the master branch. It makes the following
> > changes to the pageinspect contrib module:
> > - Updates bt_page_stats_internal function to accept 3 arguments instead
> of
> > 2.
> > - The function now uses SRF macros to return a set rather than a single
> > row. The function call now requires specifying column names.
>
> FWIW, I think you'd be way better off changing the function name, say
> to bt_multi_page_stats(). Overloading the name this way is going to
> lead to great confusion, e.g. somebody who fat-fingers the number of
> output arguments in a JDBC call could see confusing results due to
> invoking the wrong one of the two functions. Also, I'm not quite sure
> what you mean by "The function call now requires specifying column
> names", but it doesn't sound like an acceptable restriction from a
> compatibility standpoint. If a different name dodges that issue then
> it's clearly a better way.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Attached please find the latest version of the patch;
pageinspect_btree_multipagestats_02.patch.

It no longer modifies the existing bt_page_stats function. Instead, it
introduces a new function bt_multi_page_stats as you had suggested. The
function expects three arguments where the first argument is the index name
followed by block number and number of blocks to be returned.

Please ignore this statement. It was a typo.
"The function call now requires specifying column names"