| From: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: effective_io_concurrency increasing |
| Date: | 2017-06-19 01:19:11 |
| Message-ID: | CANu8FiwQVQmiCpSgu5J74s03t8bdoxF4GDm0Afr+yM6qHcroTQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I just wanna understand the effective_io_concurrency value better.
>
> My current Master database server has 16 vCPUS and I
> use effective_io_concurrency = 0.
>
> What can be the benefits of increasing that number? Also, do you guys have
> any recommendations?
>
> I'm using PG 9.2 and the official doc does not say much about which value
> you should use.
>
> If I put it to 1, does it mean I can have a query spread into 1 processor?
>
> Thanks
> P
>
*Perhaps you should read the
doc.https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/runtime-config-resource.html
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/runtime-config-resource.html>*
18.4.6. Asynchronous Behavior *effective_io_concurrency (integer)*
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patrick B | 2017-06-19 01:24:51 | Re: effective_io_concurrency increasing |
| Previous Message | Patrick B | 2017-06-19 01:02:33 | effective_io_concurrency increasing |