Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?

From: Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
Date: 2025-01-18 13:03:33
Message-ID: CANtu0ojYCjuWLg0T-Ko92_2qLcDwurepnew1jdKHj80rG1K+qg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, everyone!

I was able to stabilize (I hope so) tests on [0] without any changes to
isolationtester and without "notices N".

So, I agree, it is better to put it on a shelf now. But a few words in
documentation may be a good idea.

Best regards,
Mikhail.

[0]:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CANtu0ojXmqjmEzp-%3DaJSxjsdE76iAsRgHBoK0QtYHimb_mEfsg%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michail Nikolaev 2025-01-18 14:18:00 Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Previous Message Michail Nikolaev 2025-01-18 12:59:35 Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY