Re: Slow standby snapshot

From: Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slow standby snapshot
Date: 2022-02-21 07:12:56
Message-ID: CANtu0oi6OPCtJ4awf+25v6_f0OGpRRG6nb4HQtPscOzucCT3GQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, Andrey.

Thanks for your efforts.

> Patch on barrier seems too complicated to me right now. I’d propose to focus on KnowAssignedXidsNext patch: it’s clean, simple and effective.
I'll extract it to the separated patch later.

> I’ve rebased the patch so that it does not depend on previous step. Please check out it’s current state, if you are OK with it - let’s mark the patch Ready for Committer. Just maybe slightly better commit message would make the patch easier to understand.
Everything seems to be correct.

Best regards,
Michail.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2022-02-21 07:31:22 Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-02-21 07:09:31 Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats