Re: Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

From: Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)
Date: 2013-04-07 01:39:54
Message-ID: CANs8QJb+eXQdKO63_aDUUugaAsNaJ0Hyk6bcwhgZft+_CtnANQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ok! I will try to reproduce in a smaller scenario.

On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:

> On Saturday, April 06, 2013 12:18 PM Rodrigo Barboza wrote:
> >On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> On Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:57 AM Rodrigo Barboza wrote:
>
> >>Hello.
> >> I created a type my_uint that is a unsigned int 32.
>
> >> I am trying to update data of a table that contains a column of this
> type.
> >> Here is what happens:
>
> >> postgresql=> explain analyze UPDATE attribute_type_conf SET rowform =
> rowform +1 where rowform <= 18;
> >> ERROR: unsupported type: 132852
> >> Can you post your complete test (like your type creation and its use for
> >> table and any initial data you loaded to it)?
>
>
>
> > Well, it's a lot of data.
> > May I send it atached?
> If you can't make it to small reproducible test, then you can send.
>
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-04-07 02:16:20 Re: isolation test fails on installcheck
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-04-07 01:11:06 Re: Back branches vs. gcc 4.8.0