| From: | Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
| Date: | 2018-04-20 00:30:21 |
| Message-ID: | CANiD2e_aN7-ps-darPMJ5BpUyCj7Sj3OjEh8EJp3uCFUKFqsBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> My gut reaction to Catalin's list is that requiring C+11 is a pretty
> darn high bar to clear for older platforms.
>
It's only for latest version and we can support version 3.9 with C++98 I
think at least 5 years.
3.9.6 was realease in November 10, 2017 .
That's a pretty big shift from the project's traditional
> mindset.
>
Sure, but I think time to time it should be happen.
But to me it's a significant minus that we'd have to set against whatever
> pluses are claimed for a move.
>
It's obvious minuses but I still can't understand your position on this
question.
Regards
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-04-20 00:48:50 | Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2018-04-20 00:14:14 | Re: Built-in connection pooling |