From: | Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Hartmut Holzgraefe <hartmut(dot)holzgraefe(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
Date: | 2018-05-03 00:29:32 |
Message-ID: | CANiD2e8vO-UJ+A6aCPCe+e0wAGzdbOd4xv3kLq0nNaNT-xCLQQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> I don't think that unsubstantiated hyperbole is the right way to
> approach the task of convincing the community to adopt the approach
> you prefer.
It's not a hyperbole it's fact and I even talked about it on conference.
You should just compare all my cmake files with Makefile+.in+.m4 (and msvc
folder) it was significant reduce code to maintain.
Anyway all my intention in this field it's to reduce pain and reduce suppor
time for build system.
Curren state:
cat `find ./ | grep '\.in\|\.m4\|Makefile\|\/msvc\/'` | wc
22942 76111 702163
cat `find ./ | grep 'CMakeLists\|\.cmake'` | wc
9160 16604 278061
and also, I use code style when a source file names every time on new
line... it's serious increase numbers of line.
If compare the same style as in Makefile it will be ~3000 (you can just
compare words ;) )
Regards.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-05-03 00:29:36 | Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-05-03 00:24:38 | Re: Unportable code in autoprewarm.c |