Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name

From: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Date: 2022-07-15 07:47:58
Message-ID: CANbhV-GDU9m5C48Xxhkng3oGriZUPhZ1me_y6-CJjBGSvUAvMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 04:44, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 03:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Please note that patch authors should not switch a patch as RfC by
> > themselves. This is something that a reviewer should do.
>
> http://commitfest.cputube.org/simon-riggs.html

Thanks for showing me that, it is very helpful.

> This patch has been marked as waiting for a review, however the CF bot
> is completely red:

Yes, it is failing, but so is current HEAD, with some kind of libpq
pipelining error.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2022-07-15 07:52:13 Re: Add a test for "cannot truncate foreign table"
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2022-07-15 07:46:32 Re: Backup command and functions can cause assertion failure and segmentation fault