| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers |
| Date: | 2022-11-21 07:36:48 |
| Message-ID: | CANbhV-F20b63-ZUhjECong2spRkfudPG1ns0jfttZqhmaFECww@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 05:07, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 10:13 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I'll wait 24 hours before committing, to
> > provide a last chance for anyone who wants to complain about dropping
> > promote_trigger_file.
>
> Remove "promote_trigger_file"? Now I have never seen anybody use that
> parameter, but I don't think that it is a good idea to deviate from our
> usual standard of deprecating a feature for about five years before
> actually removing it.
We aren't removing the ability to promote, just enforcing a change to
a better mechanism, hence I don't see a reason for a long(er)
deprecation period than we have already had.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-11-21 07:38:12 | Re: Fix comments atop pg_get_replication_slots |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-11-21 07:31:27 | Re: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot() |