Re: Code checks for App Devs, using new options for transaction behavior

From: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code checks for App Devs, using new options for transaction behavior
Date: 2022-10-27 16:35:38
Message-ID: CANbhV-F1KoMtSdch8bG=W3SKJbm9K+CgQRQwXahv+KUYwgh7fw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 12:09, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Comments please

Update from patch tester results.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
002_nested_xacts.v7.patch application/octet-stream 24.5 KB
001_psql_parse_only.v1.patch application/octet-stream 2.1 KB
003_rollback_on_commit.v1.patch application/octet-stream 5.7 KB
004_add_params_to_sample.v1.patch application/octet-stream 603 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-10-27 16:59:14 heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-10-27 16:21:30 Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block