Re: stale WAL files?

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:03 PM Gmail <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Gmail <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>> On Mar 29, 2019, at 6:58 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Rob Sargent wrote:
> >>> This is pg10 so it's pg_wal. ls -ltr
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 16:33
> >>> 0000000100000CEA000000B1
> >>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 16:33
> >>> 0000000100000CEA000000B2
> >>>
> >>> ... 217 more on through to ...
> >>>
> >>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 17:01
> >>> 0000000100000CEA000000E8
> >>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 17:01
> >>> 0000000100000CEA000000E9
> >>> -rw-------. 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 28 09:46
> >>> 0000000100000CEA0000000E
> > I’m now down to 208 Mar 16 WAL files so they are being processed (at
> least deleted). I’ve taken a snapshot of the pg_wal dir such that I can
> see which files get processed. It’s none of the files I’ve listed previously
>
> Two more have been cleaned up. 001C and 001D generated at 16:38 Mar 16
>
>
>
> Please share your complete postgresql.conf file and the results from this
query:
SELECT * FROM pg_settings;
has someone in the past configured wal archiving?
You've ran out of disk space as this log message you shared states:
No space left on device
what's the output of df -h

--
El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
Thomas Alva Edison
http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/