Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down

From: Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down
Date: 2019-07-03 06:26:49
Message-ID: CAN_9JTy95UMjOVDSc-4MBrA6Fc1hX2vh=t2RMHp=yGyAV=-Xsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:01 AM Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > > Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > >> Latest patch set fails to apply, so moved to next CF, waiting on
> > >> author.
> >
> > > Rebased.
> >
> > This is in need of rebasing again :-(. I went ahead and pushed the 001
> > part, since that seemed fairly uncontroversial.
>
> ok, thanks.
>

Another rebase is needed for the patches.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-07-03 06:44:16 Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-03 06:20:24 Re: Where is SSPI auth username determined for TAP tests?