From: | Flavius Anton <f(dot)v(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres |
Date: | 2016-06-24 18:23:24 |
Message-ID: | CANXdjjafe4==2Q2d1Fbp0MBJwHYw5M2wq6=DF=4Bvsub-jQS=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Flavius Anton <f(dot)v(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Flavius Anton <f(dot)v(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd love to talk more about this.
>>
>> I thought quite a bit about this a few years ago but never really
>> picked up it to work on.
Any other thoughts on this? My guess is that it might be an important
addition to Postgres that can attract even more users, but I am not
sure if there's enough interest from the community. If I want to pick
this task, how should I move forward? Do I need to write a design
document or similar or should I come up with a patch that implements a
draft prototype? I am new to this community and don't know the code
yet, so I'd appreciate some guidance from an older, more experienced
member.
Thanks.
--
Flavius
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2016-06-24 18:35:25 | Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-24 18:07:45 | Re: Rethinking behavior of force_parallel_mode = regress |