Re: Millisecond-precision connect_timeout for libpq

From: ivan babrou <ibobrik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Millisecond-precision connect_timeout for libpq
Date: 2013-07-09 07:15:17
Message-ID: CANWdNRCsWfLhcukiqa9ZrvTOR-J2AX-ARzAJ2XRG3d6Hjn1M2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9 July 2013 11:05, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 08:31 PM, ivan babrou wrote:
>> Seriously, I don't get why running 150 poolers is easier.
>
> Did you consider running pgbouncer on the database servers?
>
> Regards
>
> Markus Wanner

Database server lost network — boom, 2 seconds delay. What's the point then?

--
Regards, Ian Babrou
http://bobrik.name http://twitter.com/ibobrik skype:i.babrou

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Krogh 2013-07-09 07:24:49 Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF] Free VMs for Reviewers & Testers
Previous Message Markus Wanner 2013-07-09 07:05:54 Re: Millisecond-precision connect_timeout for libpq