Re: [PATCH v1] Batch B-tree TIDs when building a bitmap

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Tomás Senart <ts(at)perfloop(dot)ai>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Batch B-tree TIDs when building a bitmap
Date: 2026-10-19 05:25:40
Message-ID: CANWCAZbfhB7_Cp4F3B=f9aOBymw8SNkzwu-d8zcUcnhvqDfT6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 8:18 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 9:16 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm interested in the ideas in this thread, but I'm thinking I'll wait
> > to see how the amgetbatch effort shakes out first.
>
> FWIW I don't think that amgetbatch changes the picture in a way that
> affects this patch. This technique *should* be orthogonal.

Thanks for weighing in!

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-10-19 05:39:14 Re: query_int wrongly parses zero-padded input
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2026-10-19 05:00:00 Re: pgstat: allow a stats kind to use its own dedicated dsa/dshash