Re: arrays over initdb-created types are broken after pg_upgrade

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan(at)outlook(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: arrays over initdb-created types are broken after pg_upgrade
Date: 2026-09-22 07:01:52
Message-ID: CANWCAZbRug=86r-YYofyh_8LSdngUDN=+BJOb-oTKyVfRhUFCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 1:34 PM Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan(at)outlook(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree that "AND e.typarray = t.oid" is a reasonable criterion here.
> LGTM.

Thanks for looking! I pushed with some adjustments to the user-visible
messages. In the end, I decided not to backpatch, since the reproducer
is fairly contrived, and didn't come from a field report.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2026-09-22 07:02:43 Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2026-09-22 06:54:22 Re: Why clearing the VM doesn't require registering vm buffer in wal record