| From: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re-add recently-removed tests for ltree and intarray |
| Date: | 2026-05-15 06:33:53 |
| Message-ID: | CANWCAZbEdaQzoseZ=_8mxjP7nNS0YPrDB_dQay+HuWxd6W6LRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 9:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > FWIW, I tried to reproduce with the former new tests un-reverted, and
> > didn't see stack overflow on the following, so unless I fat-fingered
> > that I wonder if there's something more specific on the previously
> > failing members:
>
> > ppc64le / gcc 8.5 / Linux kernel 4.18
> > S390X / gcc 13.3 / Linux kernel 6.8
>
> Hm, did you use -O0 ?
I just now tried -O0 on yesterday's master with ppc64le, with the
previous new tests re-added, and it did fail. Then, pulled in master
with the tests just now committed, and it passed.
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-05-15 06:36:19 | Re: Bound memory usage during manual slot sync retries |
| Previous Message | Soumya S Murali | 2026-05-15 06:27:28 | Re: [PATCH] Expose checkpoint timestamp and duration in pg_stat_checkpointer |