Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Date: 2025-08-11 09:29:04
Message-ID: CANWCAZb4q8XUPL2S+S51Cbg8s_cBqasBPX_Ae6SDgbpkdk9Upw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 4:25 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Sure I can split the patch into two. The patch only changes the .xml file to .ucm file and updating the perl script. As a result, map files should not be changed.
>
> Then the second patch will update the ucm file, so that the second patch should be small, contains only ucm changes and map file changes.
>
> One thing to confirm with you. To archive that, we will rename the ucm file as gb18030.ucm without suffix of “-2000” and “-2022”, otherwise git won’t be able to show the diff. Is that what you meant?

Usually git is pretty smart about renames combined with small changes,
so I would try keeping the original names and see what it does.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2025-08-11 09:30:09 Re: Parallel Apply
Previous Message Chao Li 2025-08-11 09:25:07 Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL