Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively
Date: 2023-11-02 14:21:02
Message-ID: CANWCAZaViqU8_qwHLgOu7gCinep_J6vgB2F-qO-7hC511zorrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:18 AM Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> wrote:
> So, it would not have been my choice to assign RfC status before getting to a resolution on that.

It's up to the reviewer (here Chapman), not the author, to decide
whether to set it to RfC. I've set the status to "needs review".

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amonson, Paul D 2023-11-02 14:22:10 Popcount optimization using AVX512
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2023-11-02 13:58:22 Re: Document efficient self-joins / UPDATE LIMIT techniques.