| From: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU again |
| Date: | 2025-08-07 10:30:26 |
| Message-ID: | CANWCAZaH=6P3AgZnF6zw2hJ3p2bwffegVh+pmRsTtLkTPujDVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 7:16 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > BTW, I see that you applied ed26c4e25 only to master, but don't
> > we want to back-patch? cpluspluscheck is not just an exercise in a
> > vacuum, it's to ensure that C++-coded extensions don't have trouble
> > with our headers.
>
> I was thinking that it was run only when developing new features, not
> for backpatch-able bug fixes, but that's a flawed assumption. I'll
> remedy that soon along with the new symbols above, unless you beat me
> to it.
This is done.
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2025-08-07 10:47:37 | Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) |
| Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2025-08-07 09:53:12 | Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE |