Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Date: 2025-10-03 06:17:14
Message-ID: CANWCAZa5ft=ep9YDKPgEVKUELxD1+QWhjiORvaWeQ3=NEOJHZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 12:12 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> * Do we want to switch UHC from using xml to ucm? That would not lead to map file change, instead it just removes the code of parsing xml file, making future maintenance easier.

I seriously doubt there will be any future maintenance, in which case
doing anything is worse than doing nothing. As for the other CF entry,
that's a separate email thread, and I've already said all I want to
say there.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-10-03 06:24:24 Re: Improve read_local_xlog_page_guts by replacing polling with latch-based waiting
Previous Message Nishant Sharma 2025-10-03 06:14:38 Re: Problem in 'ORDER BY' of a column using a created collation?